Added Support for Arduino Due #1255
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… per Page) each. So we have 2048 Pages total. We're using the first 1024 for C-Code (our Binary) and the seconds 1024 for saved Javascript Code
|
Merged! It just doesn't show as such because I did a filter-branch to remove some of the extra files. Thanks! This is looks great - and it builds easily using all the existing ARM toolchain |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR includes the full Environment to make Code for Atmel SAMD Devices (as used by Arduino), and also a working Espruino implementation for the Arduino Due.
The Arduino Due has a working REPL, Timing accurate to 10 Microseconds, all Pins can be used and the save()-Function does it's job and saves the code in the second flash bank.
What's left:
.
.
.
And much more I can't think of right now. But it should be very straightforward to implement those features.
I personally think the code is ready to merge, but I'm quite sure I've made some mistakes. So please see this PR as a discussion about my bad coding style which will eventually lead to merging. Hopefully :-)