Equipment/Product Review (1974) PINO MORRONI components
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,995
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 438 Post(s)
Liked 3,484 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Equipment/Product Review (1974) PINO MORRONI components
The article is mostly about Pino Morroni innovations, but also has brief descriptions of Cinelli M-71 pedal/cleat, CLB "Self Energizing" brake blocks, and ADS Minimal Friction brake blocks at the end.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 537
Bikes: Teledyne Titan, Bob Jackson Audax Club, Bob Jackson World Tour, AlAn Record Ergal, 3Rensho Katana.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 623 Times
in
245 Posts
__________________
Booyah Hubba-Hubba!!!
Booyah Hubba-Hubba!!!
Likes For Nemosengineer:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Fascinating article. Pino was truly an innovator, among the American machinists of the 70s, Hi-E, Phil Wood, etc...
The Stump brake "pads" are hilarious. A good April 1 joke.
The Stump brake "pads" are hilarious. A good April 1 joke.
#4
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,797
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3593 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
1,935 Posts
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,995
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 438 Post(s)
Liked 3,484 Times
in
1,002 Posts
I was wondering about that, but I looked ahead through the next 3 issues and didn't find the magazine admitting an April Fools joke or a reader asking about it.
I thought I was being Sidd Finch -ed, but couldn't prove it.
Even Classic Rendevous didn't mention it as a prank in their "Rarest of the Rare" section.
Or is the idea of increased braking distance (in concept and/or by this method) so absurd and contrary to dogma of the day or mechanical engineering principles that it's obviously a hoax?
I thought I was being Sidd Finch -ed, but couldn't prove it.
Even Classic Rendevous didn't mention it as a prank in their "Rarest of the Rare" section.
Or is the idea of increased braking distance (in concept and/or by this method) so absurd and contrary to dogma of the day or mechanical engineering principles that it's obviously a hoax?
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Even Classic Rendevous didn't mention it as a prank in their "Rarest of the Rare" section.
Or is the idea of increased braking distance (in concept and/or by this method) so absurd and contrary to dogma of the day or mechanical engineering principles that it's obviously a hoax?
Or is the idea of increased braking distance (in concept and/or by this method) so absurd and contrary to dogma of the day or mechanical engineering principles that it's obviously a hoax?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,995
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 438 Post(s)
Liked 3,484 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Dang, I suddenly feel like I'm rushing Omega House and being ushered into the side room.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.