Hi,

First, thank you for your work. I really enjoy this Bluetooth python module and its simplicity of use.

Unfortunately, I've discovered that, with passive scan, a found BLE device doesn't have the same address type than if it is discovered during an active scan. I checked the scanned results with Wireshark and it seems that the problem comes from the bluepy python module as Wireshark detects the same device address type whether an active or a passive scan is triggered.

Actually, I'm using the original python code from scanner.py (available in bluepy/bluepy/scanner.py) and I just changed the lines:

• print(strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", gmtime()), dev.addr, dev.getScanData())
  BY print(strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", gmtime()), dev.addr, dev.addrType, dev.getScanData())

• scanner.scan(10.0, passive=True) BY scanner.scan(10.0)

To illustrate my issue, for instance, when I run an active scan (with scanner.scan(10.0)), I have the following : ... 11:22:33:44:55:66 random.... And, you would have understood it, when I run a passive scan (with scanner.scan(10.0,passive=True)), I have the following : ... 11:22:33:44:55:66 public...

So please, can you fix this little problem ? Or maybe I can help you to do this if you can show me the code part involved in this process of finding device address type ?

Thanks in advance.

G.C.